Balita.org: Your Premier Source for Comprehensive Philippines News and Insights! We bring you the latest news, stories, and updates on a wide range of topics, including politics, culture, economy, and more. Stay tuned to know everything you wish about your favorite stars 24/7.

Contacts

  • Owner: SNOWLAND s.r.o.
  • Registration certificate 06691200
  • 16200, Na okraji 381/41, Veleslavín, 162 00 Praha 6
  • Czech Republic

Stairway to heaven? MMDA draws flak for steep EDSA busway wheelchair ramp

MANILA, Philippines – Is this ramp safe for wheelchair users?

The Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA) is under fire after the newly-constructed wheelchair ramp at an EDSA busway station went viral on social media for being too steep, especially for persons with disabilities (PWDs).

Instead of taking the stairs, PWDs passing by the PhilAm station in Quezon City could take an elevator, which leads to a ramp that will take them to the top of the footbridge. 

But netizens are concerned that the ramp may do more harm than good.

Some social media users even compared the structure to rollercoasters, skateboard ramps, and water slides because of its steepness.

The MMDA explained in a social media post that the ramp for PWDs was created since the elevator could not be at the same level as the footbridge, given height restrictions imposed by the Metro Rail Transit (MRT).

“Hindi ito perpektong disenyo lalo na sa mga naka-wheelchair pero malaking tulong pa rin ito para sa mga senior citizens, buntis, at ibang PWDs sa halip na umakyat gamit ang hagdan,” it said.

(The design is not perfect, especially for those using wheelchairs, but it would still be a big help for senior citizens, pregnant women, and other PWDs instead of using stairs.)

Batas Pambansa 344, a law promoting the mobility of PWDs, states that ramps should have a maximum gradient of 1:12 and their length should not exceed six meters. Longer ramps, such as the one at the PhilAm station, “shall be provided with landings not less than 1.50 meters.”

Armand Eustaquio, one of the architects who helped craft the Accessibility Law’s implementing rules and regulations, told Rappler that the controversial ramp “has a very steep gradient or 1:4 or angle of 14 degrees,” which does not meet the law’s standards.

He also pointed out that the ramp “does not have handrails at the right heights of 90cm and 70cm on both sides,” and that the flooring “is not non-skid, even when dry, for some, because of the steep gradient.” 

“The intent of Batas Pambansa Bilang 344 is give independent mobility and hence, empowerment of persons with disabilities. This was not achieved because of the steep ramp,” he said.

Felicisimo

Read more on rappler.com