Only amendments, not constitutional revision allowed in people’s initiative — Carpio

MANILA, Philippines — A people’s initiative can only amend certain provisions in the 1987 Constitution but cannot revise it, former Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio said on Thursday.

Citing the 1987 Constitution and the decision Carpio wrote in the case of Lambino v Commission on Elections (Comelec), he said that only amendments can be applied to the Constitution if it is done through a people’s Initiative since a constitutional revision needs a deliberative body. 

“I strongly believe it is unconstitutional,” Carpio said in an interview with ANC.

"To revise the Constitution, you need a deliberative body. There must be debates, and you need a recorded proceeding. So that you have a record of what they meant…It's not practical to grant, to include the revision of Constitution, in a people's initiative, because there's no debate,” he added.

According to Article 17 of the Constitution, any amendment or revision of the charter may be done through a constitutional convention, assembly, or a people’s initiative. 

A constitutional amendment, according to Carpio, “refers to any change in the Constitution that adds, reduces, or deletes without altering the basic principle involved, and without affecting the substantial provisions of the Constitution.”

A revision, meanwhile, involves an overhaul or change of the principle of one or many provisions. 

There is a purported attempt to achieve a people's initiative, with signatures being collected in certain cities in the Philippines to support amendments to the “economic provisions” of the Constitution.

The gathered signatures are being counted by Comelec, despite no petition for a people’s initiative being filed before the election regulatory body.

One of the amendments desired through the people’s initiative is to allow the House of Representatives (HoR) and the Senate to jointly vote on the amended provisions in the Constitutional Assembly.

This proposal, according to the Senate, undermines the power of the upper chamber and removes the checks and balances in the legislative department. The 24-member chamber condemned the move, which they also claimed that some members of the HoR were behind it. 

House Speaker