Philippines waiting for Timor-Leste decision on Teves extradition

MANILA, Philippines —  The Department of Justice (DOJ) is only waiting for the Timor-Leste Court of Appeals to decide on Manila’s request for extradition of expelled lawmaker Arnolfo Teves Jr.

The country’s extradition request has passed through “first screening” at the Timor-Leste Ministry of Justice, DOJ spokesman Mico Clavano said at a press conference.

“The (Timor-Leste) Court of Appeals will decide whether to deport, extradite or transfer former Congressman Teves back to the Philippines,” he added.

The deadline for a decision by the Court of Appeals is set on June 20 but the decision could be released earlier than the scheduled date, according to Clavano.

For the part of the Philippine government, Clavano said they are “ready” and will execute the decision of the Timor-Leste government as soon as the latter has decided on the request.

Teves was arrested in East Timor while playing golf at the Top Golf Driving Range and Bar in March.

He is facing murder charges over the assassination of Negros Oriental governor Roel Degamo on March 4, 2023.

He is also facing several other charges in connection with a series of killings in 2019.

The camp of pastor Apollo Quiboloy, meanwhile, is planning to ask the Supreme Court (SC) to reconsider the transfer of his cases from Davao City to Quezon City.

The SC earlier granted the request of the DOJ to transfer Quiboloy’s child and sexual abuse cases to “avoid the miscarriage of justice.”

In its administrative order released on Tuesday, the SC Second Division said they “found compelling reasons to justify the transfer of venue as the cases involve public interest.”

The SC also cited Quiboloy’s influence in Davao City, which could “cause local biases and a strong possibility that witnesses cannot freely testify due to fear and influence of the accused.”

In explaining their plan to file a petition for the reversal of the SC order, Quiboloy’s lawyer Israelito Torreon said there may have been “a violation of due process” as they never heard about the matter.

He added that the order may even be interpreted as “an attack on the judiciary” as it was based on unsubstantiated claims of bias in Davao City courts.

“It was decided based